The misunderstood world of autism

Autism is a very misunderstood affliction. Autistic people have extreme abilities and disabilities. My extreme ability is my visualizing logic of sentences, language and ideas - needing to see data as actual objects in the spaces in my mind. But among my disability is the inability discharge such analysis in manners appropriate to the perspective of normal people. 

I will argue obsessively in favour of a subject in which I have no interest or belief, simply because of my need to complete my analysis.  I have low ability to discern what people actually want me to do, even though I try my best to understand what they want me to do. I can barely tell if people are happy or annoyed with me. I have to revalidate my goals with my management frequently in annoying fashion because try as best as I could, my perspective does not allow me to pursue goals in manners commonly comprehensible by other people.

I know that many autistic people would appear normal and intelligent but would soon reveal ourselves as tangential. And then people would get angry with us because they do not understand the lack of normal perspective we possess, and  they would  think we are deliberately offending them. Some people, myself included, think that ptsd is an imaginary affliction, yet I have to accept I am wrong - because my experience tells me that people think my autism is imaginary.

The problem is what I see as normal perspective is usually not aligned with the normal perspective of normal people..But I don't see it as a problem. I use the word problem because I see my perspective as problematic to other people.

The actual problem is normal people often appear as autistic and misaligned when viewed in my perspective, so that when I try to execute my life in sincerity to good and kind within the confines of my perspective, I just don't understand why people would get angry at me. What have I done wrong ??? I've had people yell at my face telling me "trying your best is not enough" when I said that I am trying my best.

Continue next.

Time loop

… from previous post …

For those who are familiar with dynamic systems and control engineering on closed-loop (or open-loop) dynamics, and concepts like Nyquist stability analysis, you might see why we would have to superimpose each loop back onto the previous loop not in phase but in time. Actually, superimpose each future phase segment back onto the previous phase segment. In that way we should be able to analyse the stability of time loops using closed-loop analysis.

Which would require us to analyse time in at least two dimensions.What if time has three dimensions like the space we are aware of?

However, time cannot be "actually" 3-dimensional, because time is a derivative of event sequencing and not a fundamental dimension. However, when we stack time loops onto each other, we would have to defacto view the situation we have created as 2-dimensional time, as an arithmetically possible way to reference each loop individually, to make our analysis possible. We would simply be performing information design and normalization, not that time is actually multidimensional.

You need to be familiar with information schema design and normalization, to understand what I meant when I write multidimensional time is abstract treatment of non-dimensional information. If you have been a statistician forming dimensional components out of streams of data or have experience in an object-oriented programming designing hierarchy of classes, you would understand what I meant. That is, to manage the time response, you could design time in whatever structure and hierarchy that would be convenient to your information analyses.

When our descendants learn how to travel in time, it would be our first step in our journey to playing-god, a first step in fulfilling Psalm 8. Due to the fact that we realise that time perception is simply information design and normalization, and we have the authority to design or redesign dimensional views to perceive the progress of time. Gradually, we would learn to reconfigure space and time.

That is why Psalm 8 says we are only a little lesser than G’d. We are to be asymptotically near equals of G’d. That in a few billon years’ time, as we gradually draw nearer to G’d.

What if future humans discovered reverse time travel?

Let's say those are not aliens, but descendants of humans from the future. I am simply tempted to analyse the prospect, regardless if it were true. This is just a mathematical analysis of a hypothetical situation, not that I believe or accept such a situation would exist.

If you analyse logically, if future people came back to their past  to give us technology we had never invented before, then that would preempt its actual invention and cause the technology not to have been invented at all.

However, a reason why dogs eat poop or their own poop is because that is their way to effectively double the length of their digestive tracts, as we are well aware that dogs have short digestive tracts. If you have had a dog running around a horse or cow farm, you would understand. Or if you’ve seen (in disgust) your dog gobble-up a baby's poop or licking up a baby's diaper. There need to be starter material for the poop recycle. Someone has to eat an initial feedstock.

Similarly, the motivation why future people would want to pass their technology back in time, is to lengthen the effective development time of the technology. If the technology was recycled in time thro ten return loops then they would be able to achieve 5000 years of R&D by looping back 500 years 10 times.

But in order for the technology to exist to be cycled thro a stack of time loops, the following constraints must be maintained ...

• a seed technology must first be invented outside the time loop, as initial feedstock into the time loop.
• an uninterruptible 500 year conduit must be enforced to allow the technology thread to progress.

A solution to the 2nd constraint is to have segments of 50 year loops, as it would be easier to maintain political and social continuity within a 50 year period than 500 years, that is stable enough for the technology to pass back into the future to the originators of the time regression. Which would require protocols for stable and assured exchange of information from one loop segment to another.

Which would require us to analyse time in at least two dimensions. So what if time has three dimensions like the space we are aware of? However, time cannot be "actually" 3-dimensional, because time is a derivative of event sequencing and not a fundamental dimension. However, when we stack time loops onto each other, we would have to defacto view the situation we have created as 2-dimensional time, as an arithmetically possible way to reference each loop individually, to make our analysis possible. It’s simply information design and normalization, not that time is actually multidimensional.

Which means that people from the future would look different for each loop, which we might misconstrue as different races.

Also consider that people cannot physically travel faster than light as that would totally crush us regardless of what Star trek or Star wars purports is possible. It is not possible. And therefore our future would have to construct bodies (like the greys?) to carry and transport our presence and intellect, to act as remotely piloted drones back in time.

People use the word "consciousness", like as though in star trek, somehow some constraint magically presents itself to prevent commander Data from being replicated. There is no such thing as transporting your consciousness in time or space, but a projection of your presence over time and space, while actual consciousness of the pilot stay intact at his/her native time period. Technology would allow us to replicate our presence, but it would be totally ridiculous to get rid of the drone ‘s  original copy, just to make sure one version exists.

In the future we would be able to travel "instantly" across large distances of the Universe as long as we had seeded those regions with proxy drone bodies.

What if there continued to have wars and conflicts? To prevent that might be the dominance of one super-power tribe to prevent people from killing each other. Where the dominant tribe maintain technological dominance by looping R&D back in time to effectively lengthen their R&D within a short period of time.

Time looping in the future would be considered the nuclear option, a  technology which only responsible and Security Council core members are allowed to have it. There would be moratoria on its use as well as a treaty for non-proliferation of temporal adjustment. There would talks to resolve temporal adjustment disarmament.